Joe Clark: Thin-Skinned Crybaby, or Insensitive Cad? You decide

Joe Clark (pre­vi­ously men­tioned) is having some trou­ble with fans of the Opera Web Browser. Nor­mally when people are get­ting a web-​style curb stomp­ing, I like to post a little some­thing in their defense.

And in Joe’s case, I have all the reason in the world to say a few words of sup­port. He wrote the book on web acces­si­bil­ity. He’s funny, quirky, and uses the kind of cutesy lan­guage (”shurely”, “natch”) that is only bear­able in very good writ­ing. And his writ­ing is very good.

But at the moment, I’m of the opin­ion that Joe’s a bit of an asshat.

Joe likes to sound smart. If given the choice between any two things, I get the feel­ing that he’d take the one with more syl­la­bles. And I cer­tainly don’t have a prob­lem with that. But it’s led him to his favorite word to throw at geeks: “Aspergerian.”

Not that he only likes to com­pare geeks to suf­fer­ers of a life-​long tragic neu­ro­log­i­cal con­di­tion that can destroy fam­i­lies. No, he tosses it around to describe a number of people.

(And let’s remem­ber the way that insults work: you com­pare some­body to some­thing you think is neg­a­tive. For instance, when Jon Stew­art says, “You’re such a Jew.” we know that it’s not an insult because he’s Jewish. When my coworker thinks some­body is being an ass­hole and says, “don’t be such a jew,” we know that a) he doesn’t like the way that person is behav­ing, and b) he doesn’t like jews. Pretty basic, right?)

Let’s take a look at some exam­ples of how Joe uses the word:

On the other hand, I don’t have alpha geeks’ tics; aso­cial facial expres­sions, par­tic­u­larly the combo of down­turned face, upturned eyes, and Asperg­er­ian smirk; inap­pro­pri­ate whoop­ing laugh­ter [“Always reminds me of some­body machine-​gunning a seal”]; and inabil­ity to dress other than for warmth. They get more done, but I’m better-​rounded.
(Beaver­ing)

So alpha geeks have an Asperg­er­ian smirk? What does that mean? Seems like an insult in that context.

It just goes to show that Inter­net usage is so wide­spread even in dullsville Toronto that inde­pen­dent sects will pop up, even if they’re filled out with gorm­less Web-​developer girls. (You can always tell by the bad hair, the glasses, and the quasi-​Aspergerian look in the eyes.)
(Sep­tem­ber 2003 ‘Volt’ Show Reviews)

That’s def­i­nitely an insult, right? No ques­tion there.

…computer experts are rarely worth look­ing at for more then five sec­onds at a time; we are quasi-​Aspergerian and have poor fash­ion sense, with unusual excep­tions.
(You can use cap­tion­ing or you can use Heath)

Incon­clu­sive - but def­i­nitely neg­a­tive. Note that just because he includes him­self (as a com­puter expert) it doesn’t mean that he’s not using it as insult. (”I was such a retard today!”)

Pos­si­bly a fair point, though admit­tedly rather minor, but I’ve
found that crit­ics of my book have quasi-​Aspergerian capac­i­ties to
expand incon­se­quen­tial issues into blan­ket con­dem­na­tions. It’s a
fea­ture I rec­og­nize in myself, of course.
(Re: Joe Clark book review from pcpro)

Qual­i­fied by the quasi-, but still an insult.

How­ever: If, every time I dare to ques­tion Oper­atic ortho­doxy, I get a fusil­lade of name-​calling and char­ac­ter defama­tion from bor­der­line Asperg­e­ri­ans who wouldn’t know a salad fork from a browser tab, then I’m just not gonna talk about Opera.
(How very hard indeed it is to defend Opera)

Some of these other uses might be an attempt to use the clin­i­cal def­i­n­i­tion to pro­vide a (mean but) fair com­par­i­son, but this is just Joe vent­ing. There’s no call for toss­ing Asperger’s into that paragraph.

There are enough bor­der­line Asperg­e­ri­ans and autis­tics shuf­fling through the halls in Austin avoid­ing eye con­tact with other carbon-​based lifeforms…
(fuck the SXSW eti­quette guide)

Well, at least we’ve got equal time for autism suf­fer­ers as well!

I would be too Asperg­er­ian to wear a ring – I’d sit there and worry it all day – but it sym­bol­izes what I did not do.
(Engi­neers)

I’m think­ing he might have been mean­ing to pick on OCD vic­tims here and just typed “Aspergerian” out of habit.

Start­ing to see why Matt Welch told Joe, “you sound about as fun as eye surgery“? I know I am!

At this point, I’m sure that you’re all saying, “Jemal - isn’t this the sort of thing you should bring up to some­body pri­vately before you just insult them online?” Which, of course, I did. Joe denies that he’s insult­ing Asperg­e­ri­ans when he com­pares other people to them. I don’t buy it.

Seeing terms like this get­ting tossed around as insults both­ers me. Of course, part of the reason is that I have a son who I wish had Asperger’s instead of autism. But I don’t like when kids use “gay” to mean “stupid” and I don’t have any reason to think that Jared is gay. I don’t like when people use “kike” to mean “cheap” and my wife isn’t Jewish. And I greatly prefer “Let’s get it started” to “Let’s get retarded” and nobody in my house is retarded.

But then, Joe always admits when he’s wrong, right?

Let’s finish with one last quote from Joe:

You are delib­er­ately hurt­ing me, people, and you’re doing all this over soft­ware that can be repaired, unlike my feelings.

(Opera fan­boys, fuck off)

Good thing that nobody but Joe has feel­ings - least of all Aspergerians.

August 10th, 2005 · Category: Autism, Family, Free Speech · Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , · Comments Off