Chrome is Nice, But Beta

I’m really liking Google Chrome, the new browser for Win­dows (Mac and Linux some­day!) from everyone’s favorite Inter­net stock. Of course, like any Google prod­uct it’s a beta release, and likely to stay that way for the next 4-5 years. But some­how I feel like there may be some things that are too beta.

When you view a feed in most modern browsers, you either get a code-​highlighted ver­sion of the XML or a nice XSLT-​modified view of the feed as a web page. Google Chrome gives you this:

Which isn’t ter­ri­bly help­ful. By com­par­i­son, the browser whose engine they used for their ren­der­ing code, Safari, gives you this:

Which is only about a mil­lion times nicer. 

Still, Chrome is pretty nice, all things con­sid­ered. It may not be faster than Firefox,  but it feels like it is because it isn’t loaded down with add-​ons. Of course, that’s the other prob­lem: no way to extend the browser means no ad-​blocking. And I don’t imag­ine that Google plans on putting out a prod­uct that blocks their major rev­enue stream. So I’ll inevitably be switch­ing back to Fire­fox. Again.

Update: Also insuf­fer­able: the built-​in dic­tio­nary doesn’t seem to have any way to add new words, so my name will always be red-​underlined until they fix that. Sigh.

September 4th, 2008 · Category: Technology · Tags: , , , , · 1 Comment »