August 20th, 2007 by Jemaleddin Cole

…I’ve been restor­ing pages that I lost in last years Typo-​upgrade inci­dent from the Inter­net Archive. I found a bunch of what used to be my most heav­ily vis­ited pages over there that evi­dently got lost in the shuf­fle, which, while not new con­tent, means more search results for me, and maybe more ad rev­enue. Which just might moti­vate me to post some more.

I think part of my prob­lem has been I have all of these posts that I want to write: a review of What You Can Do Right Now to Help Your Child with Autism (short review: better than I expected), a larger dis­cus­sion of what it’s been like rais­ing a son with autism, and a slew of Movie and TV reviews. I think I’m at the point that I’m par­a­lyzed by the amount of things I want to write. Hope­fully, all of this work I’ve been doing on the back end of the site (Word­press 2.2.2 and the Stats plugin rock), will get me past that.

Oh, and I’m enter­ing my mid-30s today. Blech.

Category: Site Stuff
Tags:
Newer Entry: Latest Annoyance
Older Entry: Just a Small Gmail Notifier Firefox Extension Tip for users of Google Apps for your Domain

12 Responses to “So instead of actually writing anything”

  1. happy bday!

    JohnnyB

  2. Thanks, Johnny!

    Jemaleddin

  3. You were a beau­ti­ful baby. Happy Birth­day!

    skank

  4. What ads? I can’t find a single one on your site. Are they invis­i­ble?

    skank

  5. You are, or should be, run­ning AdBlock­Plus. But they’re there. =-)

    In fact, the ones you can def­i­nitely see are the spon­sors at the top right, and the link for Dreamhost which is where I make most of my money on this thing.

    jemaleddin

  6. SO stick an ad at skank.​tan​gle​bones.com

    Just don’t adver­tise some­thing that would embar­rass me. I don’t get as many hits as you but you may as well get a ben­e­fit for what little there is.

    skank

  7. I’m just not sure what having the word skank all over the place would do to the adwords sug­ges­tions. =-)

    Jemaleddin

  8. It would be a curi­ous exper­i­ment, though. Would they tend toward def­i­n­i­tion #1 that is intended by the name of this site and my nom de plume, or for def­i­n­i­tion #2 or #3 which are not?

    From http://​dic​tio​nary.​ref​er​ence.​com/​s​e​a​r​c​h​?​q​=​skank
    skank (skāngk) n.
    1. A rhyth­mic dance per­formed to reggae or ska music, char­ac­ter­ized by bend­ing for­ward, rais­ing the knees, and extend­ing the hands.
    2. Dis­gust­ing or vulgar matter; filth.
    3. One who is dis­gust­ingly foul or filthy and often con­sid­ered sex­u­ally promis­cu­ous. Used espe­cially of a woman or girl.

    skank

  9. Let’s play pre­tend! You’re an inter­net adver­tiser, look­ing to get some more page views for your sites. Which of those def­i­n­i­tions are you most likely to be using?

    Jemaleddin

  10. Take your mind and filthy imag­i­na­tion out of the gutter, boy. Where’s my bar of inter­net soap?

    skank

  11. I’m just saying: there’s a reason for Rule 34 of the Inter­net. And it’s not about danc­ing.

    Jemaleddin

  12. Hmmph!

    skank