10 Responses to “An Open Letter to American Idol Contestants, Re: Microphones”
Caveat: I have never watched American Idol.
Qualifications: I have done sound for five years for a live band. I was trained by a man who has done the sound for such disparate artists/events as Kiss, AC/DC, Lawrence College, the Sundance Film Festival, and the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City. We use a professional system costing several thousand dollars which is very much like that of smaller venue professional musicians. It was built upon his advice.
Comment: Over Christmas the man mentioned above came back from Park City, Utah to visit his family. While here he tweaked our system (sounds even better than before) and gave instructions for use of a microphone to all our vocalists. He said that they should hold the microphone so close to their mouths that their lips would occasionally brush it and no further away from their mouths than the distance of their outstretched tongue. He compared using a microphone properly to eating an ice cream cone.
Since then I have seen shots of several recording artists both in the studio recording and in live performance following his advice. Of course, they use state of the art equipment.
Why would this be important advice to follow? It has to do with the inverse square law, vocal strain, and distortion and feedback caused by holding a microphone at arm’s length. Sound pick up is considerably cleaner the closer the microphone is held to the mouth. I know that when mixing a band it is much easier to get good sound when vocalists properly hold and use a microphone. I suspect that AI contestants have been coached by the network sound techs in the best way to use a microphone if they vary fro the above recommendation.
You do see exceptions, of course, like “artist” Britney Spears who often uses a wireless headset that enables here to have more freedom of movement. But the sound suffers as a result.
Oh, I get that you’ll have better sound by keeping the microphone closer. And I’m certainly not suggesting that they hold the microphone at arm’s length. That would just be silly.
But the difference in sound quality between licking the microphone and holding it at chin level so that the television audience can see your face is negligible (except to audiophiles and sound weenies like your pal), and completely out-weighed by the fact that the show isn’t a singing competition where a bunch of experts will listen and re-listen to your performance to analyze its merits and then put you through to the next round in a fair and equitable manner. This is a popularity contest decided by people with no taste (like me) who base their decisions more on a contestant’s looks than his or her vocal abilities.
I’ll give you an example. Kellie Pickler couldn’t sing her way out of a paper bag. Heck, I don’t think she could find her way out of a paper bag. But here she is in her prom dress:
She finished 6th in the competition, beating out tens of thousands of other contestants. Also, she didn’t hold the mic directly in front of her face:
As opposed to this guy, a MUCH better singer who is almost completely obscured from view:
As a person who is mildly embarrassed to say that he’s seen those performances live, trust me - you can tell who’s holding what how. Watching these idiots hide behind the microphone night after night, I get very frustrated.
And yes, she’s too skinny. I was always more of a Katherine McPhee fan:
You’ve really seen AI live? This is inconceivable. Not that there’s anything wrong with it, but whatever for? I’d rather watch paint dry. Kidz these daze.
Not live in person, live on TV. I’m not going out to Hollywood to watch some TV show. That would be crazy. Well, unless Melinda or Lakisha make it to the finals. =-)
Look, I watch the show - the pictures could be camera-angle-impaired, but the live show clearly illustrates all sorts of contestants who have starved themselves (to prevent those camera-added 10lbs.) to the point of thinking microphones are food. Really!
Qualifications: I have done sound for five years for a live band. I was trained by a man who has done the sound for such disparate artists/events as Kiss, AC/DC, Lawrence College, the Sundance Film Festival, and the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City. We use a professional system costing several thousand dollars which is very much like that of smaller venue professional musicians. It was built upon his advice.
Comment: Over Christmas the man mentioned above came back from Park City, Utah to visit his family. While here he tweaked our system (sounds even better than before) and gave instructions for use of a microphone to all our vocalists. He said that they should hold the microphone so close to their mouths that their lips would occasionally brush it and no further away from their mouths than the distance of their outstretched tongue. He compared using a microphone properly to eating an ice cream cone.
Since then I have seen shots of several recording artists both in the studio recording and in live performance following his advice. Of course, they use state of the art equipment.
Why would this be important advice to follow? It has to do with the inverse square law, vocal strain, and distortion and feedback caused by holding a microphone at arm’s length. Sound pick up is considerably cleaner the closer the microphone is held to the mouth. I know that when mixing a band it is much easier to get good sound when vocalists properly hold and use a microphone. I suspect that AI contestants have been coached by the network sound techs in the best way to use a microphone if they vary fro the above recommendation.
You do see exceptions, of course, like “artist” Britney Spears who often uses a wireless headset that enables here to have more freedom of movement. But the sound suffers as a result.
— skank February 28th, 2007 at 5:40 am #
But the difference in sound quality between licking the microphone and holding it at chin level so that the television audience can see your face is negligible (except to audiophiles and sound weenies like your pal), and completely out-weighed by the fact that the show isn’t a singing competition where a bunch of experts will listen and re-listen to your performance to analyze its merits and then put you through to the next round in a fair and equitable manner. This is a popularity contest decided by people with no taste (like me) who base their decisions more on a contestant’s looks than his or her vocal abilities.
I’ll give you an example. Kellie Pickler couldn’t sing her way out of a paper bag. Heck, I don’t think she could find her way out of a paper bag. But here she is in her prom dress:
She finished 6th in the competition, beating out tens of thousands of other contestants. Also, she didn’t hold the mic directly in front of her face:
As opposed to this guy, a MUCH better singer who is almost completely obscured from view:
I’m just saying.
— Jemaleddin February 28th, 2007 at 9:39 am #
Kellie Pickler looks anorexic to me.
— skank February 28th, 2007 at 3:26 pm #
And yes, she’s too skinny. I was always more of a Katherine McPhee fan:
— Jemaleddin February 28th, 2007 at 7:04 pm #
— skank February 28th, 2007 at 8:06 pm #
— Jemaleddin March 1st, 2007 at 7:21 am #
— Rachel Cohen March 4th, 2007 at 8:53 pm #
— Jemaleddin March 5th, 2007 at 11:39 am #
— skank March 5th, 2007 at 5:22 pm #
— Jemaleddin March 5th, 2007 at 5:42 pm #